11/6/2023 0 Comments Deployit vs puppet![]() The original use case for Chef at OpsCode when they released their automation tool in 2009. With its minimalist design, idempotency, and sticking as close as possible to pure SSH, Ansible wins out if you want the least intrusive deployment, orchestration, and configuration management workflow. State changes are only executed if the desired state specified in your playbook is not met. This ensures, for example, if a specified OS user or say, Github remote was already added, it won't be added again in the future when you rerun the playbook. On future executions of a playbook, Ansible starts by "Gathering Facts" to identify when a specified change was performed in an earlier run of the playbook. If your team is new to DevOps tools, Ansible can cover most use cases without drowning the team in a sea of complex orchestration.Īnsible also safeguards your DevOps team from configuration drift through idempotent configuration management.Īnsible allows you to keep the state of your servers consistent in the future by running Ansible playbooks based on Ansible's inventory update policy. This means your commands are easier to reason with and the performance on the machine is fast.ĭeploying via VM images like VMWare or containerization via Docker is common for making consistent environments easier for DevOps engineers.Īnsible requires no client installation, eliminating another performance penalty from your application deployment setup. Alongside its simple YAML format for its playbooks. Unlike CHef where you need to understand Ruby domain specific language (DSL), Ansible runs fine from the command line with commands you are familiar with. Ansible Tower adds a user-friendly central dashboard where you can see the status of your servers, manage access control and monitor job runs.īesides the lower learning curve, Ansible is closer to the bare metal operating system on the remote server. This results in faster deployments and reduces the complexity of configuration files.įor enterprises, Ansible Tower a premium product that has a web-based API and graphical inventory management tool. ![]() SSH is widely supported across cloud platforms including AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. This is a different approach Chef, which has one Chef server and numerous Chef-client instances.Īnsible manages remote connections via SSH networking using implementations such as OpenSSH. Rather than setting up a client-server installation, Ansible uses an agentless architecture. It avoids the master and minions approach used by other open source configuration management tools like Chef. ![]() Ansible vs Chef: Where Ansible WinsĪnsible is a simpler approach to the configuration management work. From there, managed nodes authenticate with the master through certificates.Ĭhef agents must be configured to check in with the master periodically and instantaneous master-to-agent rollout changes aren't yet possible.Ĭhef configs are packaged into JSON files called recipes. Agents are installed from the workstation using the knife tool that uses SSH for deployment. This means a Chef installation requires a workstation to control the master. The software can be run on a client-server or in a standalone called Chef-solo.Ĭhef utilizes a master-agent model and a master server. Like Puppet, Chef is written in the Ruby programming language and its CLI uses a Ruby-based DSL. It is frequently compared and contrasted to other old-timer CM tools like Puppet. It is supported by parent sponsor OpsCode.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |